DocRon Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 As long as I'm dreaming: swap out the 912 up to a 914, fixed pitch or constant speed. The Arizona highlands are kinda tough on getting enough manifold pressure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug G. Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Yeah, our -3,000 ft. DA days are kinda nice one there is some heat in the plane. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocRon Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 Sure hope you can make it down to Page this October. Maybe we can show you some density altitudes not found in Fargo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug G. Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 Looking less likely Ron, I am sitting with Mom in the hospital as we speak. This is the eighth time since October. We are also in the process of moving her to assisted living. Right now I am on my own Char is with our daughter touring Norway. It is tough to plan anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocRon Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Sorry to hear it, Friend. I hope your mother improves and gets settled comfortably. Maybe we'll see you down here yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilot1950 Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 I have a private with 700 hours, 250 in my CTLS and the rest in cessna and cherokees. I let my medical go cause it was getting iffy. We go on 2-6hr cross countrys. If the 3rd class goes away my wife would like me to go to a 172 or cherokee for the heavier (smooth) ride in rough air. I take my flight review in a 150 and it feels like a battle ship compared to CTLS. I enjoy flying for about $20 per hour in gas (mogas) vs $50-60 per hour using 100LL. I also figure prices of good used 172's etc will jump up and the value of my CTLS will drop and would have a hard time selling it but I am all for getting rid of 3rd class.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandpiper Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 I have a private with 700 hours, 250 in my CTLS and the rest in cessna and cherokees. I let my medical go cause it was getting iffy. We go on 2-6hr cross countrys. If the 3rd class goes away my wife would like me to go to a 172 or cherokee for the heavier (smooth) ride in rough air. I take my flight review in a 150 and it feels like a battle ship compared to CTLS. I enjoy flying for about $20 per hour in gas (mogas) vs $50-60 per hour using 100LL. I also figure prices of good used 172's etc will jump up and the value of my CTLS will drop and would have a hard time selling it but I am all for getting rid of 3rd class.. I would probably keep my CT, sell the RV-12 project and then go back to a C-180, 182 or 206 as the "going somewhere" aircraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Baker Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 I have a private with 700 hours, 250 in my CTLS and the rest in cessna and cherokees. I let my medical go cause it was getting iffy. We go on 2-6hr cross countrys. If the 3rd class goes away my wife would like me to go to a 172 or cherokee for the heavier (smooth) ride in rough air. I take my flight review in a 150 and it feels like a battle ship compared to CTLS. I enjoy flying for about $20 per hour in gas (mogas) vs $50-60 per hour using 100LL. I also figure prices of good used 172's etc will jump up and the value of my CTLS will drop and would have a hard time selling it but I am all for getting rid of 3rd class.. You know I am just the opposite. I have a medical , and I have both a Piper Warrior and a CTLS. If I want to go somewhere and don't need the extra seats I will take the CTLS every time. When I do fly the Warrior I think to myself what a dog it is compared the CT. I think the battleship feel is because of the extra weight and lack of performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 You know I am just the opposite. I have a medical , and I have both a Piper Warrior and a CTLS. If I want to go somewhere and don't need the extra seats I will take the CTLS every time. When I do fly the Warrior I think to myself what a dog it is compared the CT. I think the battleship feel is because of the extra weight and lack of performance. That's something I ponder...if this all goes through and I'm able to get a PP without a medical, it's likely I will. But I don't know how I would do flying those bigger airplanes, since literally 100% of my flying time is in airplanes with a 1320lb gross weight. I can see myself getting behind a heavier airplane with less climb and acceleration performance and more inertia and control lag. That would require some real retraining I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Cesnalis Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 My experience is that it is quite easy to transition from a very light aircraft to a heavier single. Flight Design's experience is that it is difficult to transition pilots from heavier aircraft to a light sport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Baker Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 That's something I ponder...if this all goes through and I'm able to get a PP without a medical, it's likely I will. But I don't know how I would do flying those bigger airplanes, since literally 100% of my flying time is in airplanes with a 1320lb gross weight. I can see myself getting behind a heavier airplane with less climb and acceleration performance and more inertia and control lag. That would require some real retraining I think. Andy, I have over 5,000 hours in airplanes heavier than the CT, but would still choose the CT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingMonkey Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 Andy, I have over 5,000 hours in airplanes heavier than the CT, but would still choose the CT. Sure, and I agree with that! I'd choose a smaller, more nimble airplane with better power-to-weight ratio, especially with a joystick (not a lover of yokes) over a heavier one...unless I had more stuff/people to haul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anticept Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 My experience is that it is quite easy to transition from a very light aircraft to a heavier single. Flight Design's experience is that it is difficult to transition pilots from heavier aircraft to a light sport. This is the FAA's position too. Over half of the accidents are high time transitioning pilots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.