Jump to content

Piper Sport emergency landing on golf course, flips in water hazard


opticsguy

Recommended Posts

This happened last weekend.  A PS which flies a lot of training out of KADS had a "power loss" and the student masterfully put it down on a golf course fairway but chose to hit a water hazard rather than fences along the fairway.  The plane flipped and sank in 3-4 feet of water (I saw TV footage of it being lifted out of the water).  How they guy got out of a tip-up canopy upside down in water is beyond me.

 

I couldn't find an NTSB report, but it was disturbing that a Rotax would stop in flight unless it was a fuel-selector issue. I also heard through the grapevine that this Rotax had recently been apart (e.g., overhaul or cylinder head replacement).   This investigation is worth following.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I couldn't find an NTSB report, but it was disturbing that a Rotax would stop in flight unless it was a fuel-selector issue.

 

Should not be particularly disturbing.

 

All types of engines stop in flight for all sorts of reasons - the ROTAX is not immune.

 

The "Achilles Heel" seems to be vulnerability to float bowl and float issues and vulnerability to the tiniest bit of debris.

 

Whether engine problems are more or less common in the ROTAX is still an open question, I think.

 

And, yes, as always the investigation is worth following. Far too often, nothing can be determined as to the cause, since many engine stoppages and power losses are due to a transient condition - slug of water, debris temporarily blocking the main jet - that sort of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without getting the rumor mill going, it needs to be seen if it was worked on by an, ahem, qualified Rotax repairperson.  There is none at the field where the plane was based.

 

Flights after any sort of major repair or maintenance are the most risky.  I tried to get the guy who did my 5 year hose swap to go up with me on the first flight.  Nothing doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not get at your actual point instead of baiting the issue.  We can do this all day long.  My comment was more about sport pilot claiming he wont fly unless there are two pilots and about his contention that he trained himself out of a book (which if true, would require him to fly without a PIC and a license)....

My point was to get you to answer a question based on a statement you made, nothing more. I don't really care why you made the statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...