Jump to content

Sky Arrow Annual


FastEddieB

Recommended Posts

Eddie,

 

No. 3 at 69/80?

 

Didn't that merit further investigation at the time?

It does seem to fall into the acceptable range as published by ROTAX:

 

"The maximum permissible pressure drop is 25 %, e.g. from 6 to 4.5 bar (87 psi to 65 psi) (D).

If the pressure loss is less than 25% then the valve seats and piston rings are working properly."

 

That minimum figure at 80 psi would be 60 psi.

 

Not arguing that it doesn't seem lower than most - just that ROTAX still puts it in the acceptable range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Eddie,

 

"The maximum permissible pressure drop is 25 %, e.g. from 6 to 4.5 bar (87 psi to 65 psi) (D).

If the pressure loss is less than 25% then the valve seats and piston rings are working properly."
That minimum figure at 80 psi would be 60 psi."

 

This is bad info and misleading. We all wish Rotax would revise it. Will the engine run here, yes, but not a single class does anyone subscribe to that as being okay. They will all tell you if there is even a 10 psi drop from the other cylinders it's time to find out why. That's because of the very tight tolerances of this engine. The air cooled engines aren't this way so the 25% is acceptable,but not here.

 

Your case is different. You don't have a single drop. Yours are like that across the board so that leads me to suspect bad gauges or a leak in your test equipment. If there is a large drop in differential the good news it usually isn't the rings and is more likely the valves are coated with lead or carbon. Typically a differential compression test is only 1-2 psi difference between cylinders and usually only 2-4 psi below test pressure.

 

This is one point not to try and stand on the Rotax manual. You absolutely don't want to have that differential drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one point not to try and stand on the Rotax manual. You absolutely don't want to have that differential drop.

I'm not doubting your expertise in the least, but...

 

...this is exactly what others have complained about - that there seems to be a privileged cabal of cognoscenti that hold the true knowledge of all things ROTAX.

 

Kinda like, "Who you going to believe, me or the manual?*"

 

But I'm taking all this to heart, an I'm going to post to my EAA chapter right now about getting another set of gauges to compare. I'll also take a close look at mine to see if there's any possibility of a leak in the gauge/valve/orifice setup - should be pretty straightforward with some soapy water. I'll let you know what I find.

 

 

*Stipulated that manuals do get it wrong, sometimes - as shown in my recent Marc Ingegno brake thread!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rotax in this case isn't absolutely wrong. That is their limit as it is the rest of the aviation community. The huge but is that they believe there is an issue if you have any cylinder 10 psi down from test or that is different from the others.

 

The knowledge is out there.

 

This is why anyone that does their own maint. or wants this info ABSOLUTELY HAS to go to classes. This is the only place to get your info unless you want to take what people say to heart on a forum. Then you have to know if that person has been going to classes and is up on their game.

 

The knowledge isn't hidden or secret, but you have to get involved at another level and it cost money. That's the bad part.

There is only one difference between you and me. I go to Rotax classes every year, take classes from Rotax people and ask lots of questions.

 

 

p.s.

 

I finally got all my approvals and got everyone on the same page from all sources and will start teaching the Service level class in Tucson at a nice facility. The difference is this service level class compared to what is normally taught will be on steroids. We are going to get out of the classroom (some is still required), work on live engines and target going through an entire annual. Students will be turning wrenches and you will get a Rotax certificate for this. I'm in the process of setting up the dates as we speak. I should have them nailed down by Monday. These will be weekend classes instead of weekday classes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eddie, check your gauges. With the cylinder fitting removed set your air pressure to 87 as you would doing the test, and read the pressure on the other gauge. If it is not 87 use the difference to come up with a correction factor. It is not uncommon for gauges to be off. They should probably be tested annually, but most are never tested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

I have a friend on the way to the hangar with another set of gauges.

 

Seems like checking mine should be trivially easy - cap the hose going to the cylinders and see if both gauges measure the same, right?

 

Tom - thanks! We both posted at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spray a little soapy solution around the fitting that screws into the spark plug hole and make sure it doesn't leak and possible spray all your fittings.

 

 

Staying well informed is all about networking. Get in the system and get to know the people in the know.

Networking is the cornerstone of the 21st. century. Too much info for any one person to have it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The manuals are written for world use, 3 different engines, different setups and upper and lower limits. It's up to the end user to get the education to know the differences.

 

That said there are a few spots for sure that can be redone, but you have to convince Rotax hierarchy in Austria. A different culture.

 

They have to be doing something right. They supply over 80% of the world's light aircraft engines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the gauges are at least part of the problem, about 2 or 3 psi worth with both gauges measuring the same pressure:

 

26735608675_03506ca4cf_z.jpg

 

26642308892_417ce408fb_z.jpg

 

Doing the checks again cold with my friend's gauges showed just a slight improvement, between 1 and 3 psi:

 

26710158386_acdd541b00_z.jpg

 

For now, not going to worry excessively.

 

Rather than replacing the gauges, next time probably just take the left gauge to 89 psi for testing purposes and reading the right gauge as is.

 

Did not remember to look up Roger's readings  - I'll try to remember tomorrow.

 

 

BTW, spent another 4 hours or so with a friend helping and did most of the fuselage/cockpit stuff. Still need to finish that up, do the wings and landing gear and a couple of things to the engine and throw everything back together. Figure about 1/2 way there. Going pretty smoothly so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worked another 4 or 5 hours today. Tomorrow just need to reassemble the cockpit, replace the ELT batteries, and go through the drudgery and mess of the landing gear stuff.

 

Roger, here are the compressions you got in 2012: #1 87/83, #2 87/83, #3 87/84 and #4 87/83.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eddie:

 

You can adjust those gauges, but you need a reliable source to calibrate against... since it would not be possible to answer if it's the left, or the right, that is inaccurate.

 

Basically, you pull the faces off, then pull the needles off and put them back on in the right orientation, while under test pressure.

 

Bourdon tube gauges also work the best in the mid range.

 

I'm surprised there isn't much in the way of digital gauges yet. I know they exist, but they are extremely expensive for a reliable one. Still, it's extremely rare to have to calibrate a solid state device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrap up...

 

Basically wrapped things up Tuesday and knocked off the paperwork yesterday. Too windy and cold and rainy today to test fly, but I still have to - 3i provides a post-maintenance checklist I like to follow (below, if you're curious).

 

About 5 hours a day for 5 days. No real surprises. Caught a small drip from an inline fuel filter I had installed - it just needed to be snugged up a bit.

 

Cost was probably less than $100 - the cost of the spark plugs, oil and filter, some distilled water to top off the coolant reservoir (along with antifreeze I already had), and about $12 for new D cells for my ELT.

 

Anyway, rewarding to get down and dirty and get 'er done - for another year, anyway!

 

26233609954_feb36d40f2_z.jpg

 

26233610264_fddb571140.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, those 5 pages take me about 25 hours to go through, and seem pretty darn thorough.

 

Thorough enough that I'll sign off that the little guy has been found to be in a condition for safe operation!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, those 5 pages take me about 25 hours to go through, and seem pretty darn thorough.

 

Thorough enough that I'll sign off that the little guy has been found to be in a condition for safe operation!

 

You will discover if that is true in the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will discover if that is true in the air.

As will every pilot on their first flight post-maintenance/inspection flight, whether they did the work or trusted someone else with it.

 

Coincidentally, I just got back from my test flight. You'll be pleased to know everything checked out perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...