Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


About Runtoeat

Contact Methods

  • Yahoo

Profile Information

  • Location
    Belleville, Michigan
  • Interests
    Target shooting, running, flying and tinkering (i.e., trying to screw up things that are working OK)
  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

11,605 profile views
  1. New panel insert

    I made a panel last year out of 6061 .060" aluminum. I cut this on my band saw with no issues and smoothed the edges with a flat file. If you have a bench belt sander this would be best but I don't have one. The big problem is cutting the holes for instruments. Since I have mostly steam gages, I borrowed the local EAA club's hole puncher for the 2 1/4" and 3 1/8" holes. Be careful to not use too thick of material. It takes a lot of force to punch holes! After forming the panel, I cut a section of 80 grit band saw belt and stapled this to a piece of 16" long wood. After anchoring the panel to my bench, I pulled the board with sandpaper in a straight direction across the panel a few times to get the surface to look like the original factory. Lastly, I clear coated the panel. It is hard to tell the new one on the left side from the old on the right side. Here's another way to form the instrument holes: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/topages/instrumentmounting.php
  2. BRS deployment from unrecoverable spin

    If this would have been me, you'd see me getting out of the plane and kissing the ground! Oh yeah, and I wouldn't have my back to the camera.
  3. BRS 1350HS Rocket Kit

    Thanks for the info Bill.
  4. BRS deployment from unrecoverable spin

    He looks like he stayed cool. Went towards the handle a couple of times but seemed to try to get the best attitude before pulling? Pretty scary to see him working to arrest the spin to no avail.
  5. CTLS landing for beginners

    Buckaroo, wondering where you got this "fact" from? Personally, and FWIW, I have less difficulty and am more under control landing with flaps and use "squirts" of throttle to adjust my sink and am ready to go full power if I need to get up and away from the runway due to bad judgement on my part. This is my personal preference. I often land with "0" flaps and all other settings to stay in touch with my CT and to be able to land if I might loose electrical power. I'm now over 2,600 landings with a Flight Design. It is important to keep in mind that there are as many landing techniques as there are pilots and it is useless to "preach" on one method since this does no good. Question #1: If use of flaps makes landings more difficult and risky, why do aircraft manufacturers continue to waste money and add weight by providing them? Question #2: If you enjoy speed during landings, why do you only use "0" flaps? Why don't you use "-6"?
  6. BRS 1350HS Rocket Kit

    Al, if you have any interesting or informative pictures, please share them with us. Thanks.
  7. ISO CTLS 2008 - 2012

    Trip, don't forget, "what goes up must come down". This applies to both stocks and airplanes!
  8. CTLS landing for beginners

    FWIW, I was trained to use full flaps under even high cross wind conditions and I use full flaps for all landings. My instructor started out flying in a Aeronca Champ at age 15 , he has over 4,000 hours in rotary, he trained and flew in the army (Cobra gunships), flew in the Coast Guard and retired after flying commercial jets for a well known company. I'm just trying to give some background of the person who I fly with often and who trains me each time we fly together. I believe I am probably one of the most fortunate people to have #1 bought a CTSW and #2 have been introduced to flying techniques probably not many other FD owners have been shown. I personally feel that the Flight Design has adequate rudder authority to control the plane up to my personal limit of 25 kt cross wind. It has ability to provide authority for higher but this is my limit. Yes, it takes a low wing approach to the runway or a crabbed approach, but this can safely be accomplished PROVIDED THE PILOT HAS HAD GOOD TRAINING! For the non trained pilot, I recommend doing whatever you are comfortable with but please consider looking into the full flap landing technique to have this in your bag of abilities. This plants you on the runway and eliminates ballooning. It also is easier to keep an attitude which prevents tail dragging that can occur during low flap landings. The 2006 CTSW had the vertical tail and rudder enlarged to provide increased rudder authority specifically for the purpose of landing in cross winds. The FD has adequate power to lift the plane up and away from the runway with full flaps, should the timing and attitude not be correct during the final approach.

    Good question. Not sure about the shelf life of the LiFePo but standard lithium's have extremely good shelf life.
  10. CTLS landing for beginners

    Buckaroo, I'm on record as being a "full flaps" pilot. I understand that you've landed your 182 Cessna in a particular way in the past. Regarding landing the Flight Design with 0 flaps, I'm getting a picture in my mind of going extremely fast and my CT not wanting to come down with the end of the runway fast approaching when I read your comments about carrying the speed you do. Then, a sudden gust of wind pops up and my CT balloons up off the runway and it's "go 'round time". I do landings with all flap settings to understand my airplane but mostly all landings I do are with full flaps and are hi drag and slow with good control. As for taking off, I do keep the nose down until reaching the appropriate speeds for climb from the runway. The majority here probably use 15 and some use 0 flaps for landing. There is no "right or wrong" and everyone has their own methods. My hope is that you continue to have safe flights.
  11. Roger, I've only seen the ones that had bad landings. The bent gear rod in the scrap metal bin didn't present that nice of a picture. Good to know there could be damage like this without a bad landing.
  12. CTLS landing for beginners

    Buckaroo, If you're landing with 0 flaps, you are at maybe 70kts during your final approach and your touch down is probably around 65 to 70kts IAS? If your airfield is at a higher elevation you might have a significantly higher ground speed than your IAS. I'm thinking that may be going pretty fast over the ground when you touch down. You might like the lower landing speeds which more flaps provide.
  13. Buckaroo, I am not an expert and Tom Baker knows much more than I but based on a few CTSW's I've seen with damage like this, you many need at least one new aluminum landing gear strut for this side of your CT.
  14. Neuform 1500 Hour Extension SB TM-17-01

    BravoFoxtrot, I kind of read it the same as you. I'm thinking there is a time limit but Neuform is telling those who are now at the 1500 hours to not worry about it since the limit will be well beyond where they are now. This might take a call to Arian at FD USA to see if he knows anything about it. I talked to Arian 2 days ago about the Neuform inspections and he didn't mention anything about this.