Jump to content

CTxx landings a pitch attitude approach.


Ed Cesnalis

Recommended Posts

Be careful, once again the CT with a static leak will cause a 7 to 10 knot false increase in airspeed. Just putting a wrench on the static fittings is not enough, it can be the EFIS, autopilot, airspeed indicator, etc. I've  done hundreds of static checks on all types of aircraft.  I've had planes close to stall on approach and yet shown normal airspeed. My CT had a 10 knot false indication when I purchased it from Airtime ( not their fault, it's not a required check for VFR). It's an easy and cheap check to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ed Cesnalis said:

 

 

This thread is about a pitch attitude approach  that is extremely simple and safe.  Numbers don't really apply.  Sub-optimal approach speeds make it impossible without adding power as you can't achieve the landing attitude and instead do something close to the three point landing.

The primary reason for presenting this pitch attitude approach is to show how to easily finish/contact in a landing attitude (Vy climb attitude).  It also takes away any need for complexity ( 1 speed maintained by trim and 1 config from abeam to ground effect ). Finally it uses optimal approach speed not based on any instrument.  

 

Ed, I primarily teach flying by pitch attitude with reference to airspeed. If you know what the sight picture is supposed to be your speed will be just about right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Madhatter said:

Be careful, once again the CT with a static leak will cause a 7 to 10 knot false increase in airspeed. Just putting a wrench on the static fittings is not enough, it can be the EFIS, autopilot, airspeed indicator, etc. I've  done hundreds of static checks on all types of aircraft.  I've had planes close to stall on approach and yet shown normal airspeed. My CT had a 10 knot false indication when I purchased it from Airtime ( not their fault, it's not a required check for VFR). It's an easy and cheap check to do.

Just go at altitude and do a few stalls ... you will know your true stall speed static leaks or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s interesting.  Folks who land at super slow air speeds are in two groups; the incredibly skilled, and, the folks that need their airspeed gizmos recalibrated. Those of us who are landing fine and want to do better /slower /shorter would be wise to be cautious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...