Jump to content

Inadvertent Icing and Engine Breather Obstruction


MEH

Recommended Posts

I recently heard of a Flight Design which encountered inadvertent icing resulting in obstruction of the breather tube coming from the engine. This obstruction resulted in an increase in the crankcase pressure such that an oil seal was "blown" and the engine puked out most of its oil before landing. A low oil pressure alarm resulted before the engine could be shut down. This loss of oil and oil pressure resulted in suspected fatal engine damage.

In the "Certificated" world, stock engine breathers must contain a vent hole within the engine compartment for such a contingency.  (See attached photo.)  Should icing develop, the vent hole at the edge of the engine compartment would be a "safety", allowing the engine blow-by to be vented without increasing crankcase pressure should the end of the breather get clogged by ice. 

Similarly, fuel vents that hang out in the slipstream, and are susceptible to icing on their leading edges, have a hole on the trailing surface for just such protection. (See attached photo.)

Although the Flight Designs are not permitted "Flight Into Known Icing Conditions", it would seem to me that perhaps we should consider adding a vent hole to the engine breather at the bottom of the engine compartment as a point of safety should inadvertent icing be encountered.

Just thinking out loud.

engine breather.JPG

Fuel vent.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"....Although the Flight Designs are not permitted "Flight Into Known Icing Conditions", it would seem to me that perhaps we should consider adding a vent hole to the engine breather at the bottom of the engine compartment as a point of safety should inadvertent icing be encountered...."

It is not just "Flight Into Known Icing Conditions" or "inadvertent icing" that is the concern -- flying along on a beautiful but freezing VMC day can also be of concern.  The crankcase vent spews out water as a normal by-product of engine combustion. When this exiting water gets cold enough near the exit point of the vent line it may freeze thus causing blockage of the line leading to increased crankcase pressure and potential failure of the crankshaft/crankcase seals.  I suspect that for the Rotax 900-series engines with its remote oil tank this increasing back-pressure would additionally interfere with the proper return of residual crankcase oil to the oil tank and possibly result in other internal oil flow issues.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be interested in seeing how cold that air and moisture could get, but I find it very unlikely to freeze over itself without being in arctic conditions. The oil circulating in the tank is easily 150 degrees on subzero F days, those are crankcase blowby gasses dumping out of that breather tube, and there is a LOT of air blowing out of that tube. Finally, the reason the cowling has that separation down there is that is where the formerly cold from the cylinder fins and radiator are exiting.

Whistle slots are cut into breather tubes on certified aircraft as a last resort, but you have to be in some pretty nasty ice.

That's not to discount the concern, the tube really should not be whipping around in the wind carelessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...