Jump to content

Insurance


CT4ME

Recommended Posts

My Avemco insurance went down, again. After calling them with updated hours, and letting them know about ASF on-line classes taken... my rate went down about $400 ! biggrin.gif It's now around $1900 /yr, which seems very reasonable for the $100K coverage. Newish pilot, no incidents, 275 hours - mostly in CT.

 

 

How about the rest of you? What insurance? rates? experiences? Claim performance? I just got a thing from Avemco fully disclosing their denied claims percentages and reasons for denying claims... interesting reading. Maybe we can have a chat night with insurance reps...

 

Tim

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tim,

 

Try Aviation Insurance Resources. Chris Wolbert, Regional VP, at 301-682-6200.

I had Avemco, but these guys, which are major players, were down another $400 from Avemco. I have $110K no deductibles and pay $1616 because of my partner which has less hours than me. Won't hurt to give them a call. tell him I sent you if you get a quote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a quote from AIR. They wanted $1900. Maybe I should have called back but I didn't feel like negotiating. They had already indicated that rates were going up with their next renewal on most policies. If there was room for negotiating that means they were jerking me around and I don't like that. I get enough of that when I buy a car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My coverage in the first year, with USAIG through Aviation Insurance Resources, was $1330 (zero deductible). Upon renewal, it went up to $2075 in spite of my having an additional 100 hours all in type and no claims. When I first went with that carrier, they were new to the light sport marketplace and were pricing aggressively. After a year of experience, they found they had to raise their rates. Among the 5 carriers AIR shopped it to, they were still the lowest price, and also had the lowest deductible (still zero).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the recent brief discussion on the pros and cons of recertifying to ELSA. I'm guessing rates would rise however value would drop so insurance cost would be awash. Any SWAG on how much an SW would go down in value if ELSA'd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi John,

 

With your hours you should be cheaper than me. You may want to call them back

 

 

Well, my hull $$ amount is for $138K, which probably explains the difference. I'll probably lower that next year as the plane depreciates. Just can't make myself do it yet. (It's sad watching your $$ go down)

 

John

 

PS Just figured out you were talking to another "john"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi John,

 

The plane in the insurance company's eyes doesn't depreciate. If you total it they will give you the full valve of the policy. Not like a car where they give you less every year. You can reduce the amount it is insured for, but if something happens you would loose your investment above that lowered insured amount. I don't think there would be a big policy reduction if you went down to lets say $110K. Wouldn't hurt to ask them though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

2006 CTSW, 119 hours on airframe, $75k in hull value, brand spanking new sport pilot with 42 hours. USAIG through Falcon Insurance (EAA's Partner) $1733.00 for 12 months. They required 3 hours transition training (was flying PiperSport). I do keep plane in hangar. For a newbie pilot I didn't think it smelled too bad. That's for 0 deductible and for $1M in liability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I am also at Falcon, 140K hull, $2100, 1$M liability, 2500 hours. I had a claim when my tire blew on landing at Henderson two years ago and took out the right wheel, pant and brakes. They were super with the claim -- absolutely great. WF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm contemplating moving from a tower controlled airport (7000' by 100' runway) to an uncontrolled airport (3000' by 60' paved runway) that is a bit closer to home a bit less expensive. Does anyone know if insurance would be the same? In other words, do insurance companies believe a tower lowers risk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Standard procedure. Out here added insurer includes the actual hangar owner, the airport that the land is leased from, the city/county the airport resides in and the council or Board of Supervisors.... All named separately.

Wait till you get into the County and State personal property tax requirements and forms. Really exciting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone one been requested to add the hangar owner as a 'named insured' to their aircraft insurance policy? I jsut ran into this one and my knee jerk reaction is: heck no!

 

 

I've had to provide that for both hangars I have rented. An email to the insurance agent takes care of it, no charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My issue is not with ease of adding a named insured but with the concept. The city of Addison tried a similar thing at KADS a few years back and couple groups fought and won. Basically, the 'named insured' extension of protection would have to apply to all users of the airport (transients, delivery people, etc) or none at all.

 

Probably inevitable but I'm passing for the time being since I still have a choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

'Glad to report my insurance is down to just a touch over $1500. Got quotes from some brokers and AIR (jon shimer) provided me with the best deal. I was paying about $2k through Avemco, but will be changing to Chartis Aerospace. No deductible, 1 million total combined, $100K per person, $100K hull, $5K medical per person...

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those rates look fairly consistent over recent years. A year ago, I read somewhere that rates partially reflect the need for all pilots, even high-time-know-it alls, to recieve transition training. No argument here, how about out there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...